Here's a short list of my own personal requests; Sechs and Rags will probably post some later, and we'll all add new requests to the thread as we think of them:

• Sage having sex with Tina Lynx; preferably, this would feature Tina on top of Sage. Zig Zag and/or Sechs reacting to the scene somewhere in the background would be a fun bonus, but not necessary.
• Sage having sex with Tila Sunrise from Las Lindas' "Dungeons and Dames" and "Breasts Are the Best" bonus comics.
• Any of the following characters in a revealing harem outfit: Gadget Hackwrench, Callie Briggs, Squirrel Girl, Sechs Fuckheaven

This is very relevant to my internets

>If you draw a picture of Sage, Sechs, or Rags (or any combination of the three), you'll earn adspace for any amount of time up to two months.

Wow. Now I wish I had something to sell.

Now I'm curious. I'm sort of a newcomer to these parts so I missed some critical information; are you guys hosted for free by someone and just use the ad space entirely for this stuff, or is it just cheap enough that you can blow off the occasional month or two worth of revenue without problems?

>>83

We don't make revenue from the site AT ALL. Sechs pays for the hosting out of her own pocket; we get the hosting for a pretty good price from cho0b (he who runs wtfux and Lulz.net). Our adspace is strictly an "art for ads" deal. Despite my *ahem* loose stance on copyrights and such, even I would feel pretty bad if we used the board (which, for all intents and purposes, runs off the back of other people's content) to make money for ourselves.

Since neither Sechs nor myself are artists (and I think that Rags would fall under that qualifier as well), we decided that having people do pics for us would be a better way to offer adspace on the board.

>>84
>I would feel pretty bad if we used the board to make money for ourselves.

Well duh. But it seems weird to me to still have ads even if you don't need or use them to keep from operating at a loss. The main reason I've learned to tolerate Internet ads in general is that I know they're necessary to keep the bulk of the Internet running.

But then, I guess online advertising did start as people just swapping ads for free to cross-promote the sites they still ran at a loss. So I'll shut up now.

...Say, if I were to draw art of any of your characters, would I get to use my ad space to make the site ad-free for a week or so?

>>86

>But it seems weird to me to still have ads even if you don't need or use them to keep from operating at a loss.

It's our way of doing something nice for the artists who post around here. We don't HAVE to have ads on the site; we do it because we want to.

>Say, if I were to draw art of any of your characters, would I get to use my ad space to make the site ad-free for a week or so?

Uh...seeing as how that defeats the purpose of us having the adspace in the first place, I'm gonna have to say no on that.

I should note, the gallery page has changed location.

http://dammitfreehaven.com/news.php?p=gallery