Q: Does Jay Naylor have a real job?

A: No. As of this point in time, Naylor's income is wholly from selling "pornfolios", and recently doing commissions. He was previously employed as a low-level worker at Kinko's.

Q: Why do you keep reading his stuff if you hate it?

A: For many individual reasons. Some of us don't read it outside of this board. Some of us do so because we find amusement in picking it apart, not in the actual reading.

Q: Is it just his politics that you hate?

A: Hating Jay Naylor is surprisingly apolitical. Conservatives, liberals, libertarians, Republicans, Democrats, and independents alike have gathered on this board, united in pointing out the offensive imagery, insulting nature, and condescending tone of Jay Naylor's works. But no Communists, because they're idiots and I ban them.

>>apolitical
>>But no Communists, because they're idiots and I ban them.

DERP

(And nothing of value was lost.)

>>18071

>>18071

Derp indeed.

Are there some comics/porns with VERY thin implanting of his beliefs? As in, there is NO attempt to cover it up with plot?

>>18087
the red riding hood pornfolios, especially the most recent one i think all qualify for his woman hating views. The women are all just outright traitors.

This was brought up in a skype conversation I was in yesterday: why exactly does Sage hate Jay so much?

Other than the ever so gorgeous Shalindria and the slightly odd J3T, who on else was drugged enough to date Naylor?
Other than the latest trade-in.

Are objectivists allowed here? As in, people who believe Ayn Rand's philosophy, not Naylor-lovers.

>>18098

Markhale.

>>18097

I can't speak for Sage. I hate him because, well, he's arrogant, condescending, rude, dismissive... and that's just to his fans. The stuff he puts out are offenses against art and literature and everything they should be. His work is bigoted and preachy... I hate him the same way I would any terrible author.

Sage would probably say he doesn't hate Jay, because he's wimpy like that.

>>18102

Yes, but keep it to yourself unless you want to be mocked, or unless you want to point out how Jay's actually sucking at being an Objectivist or something. Otherwise they're about half a rung above communists.

>>18105
I'd rather remain separate from bad objectivists such as Naylor. And thanks for beign tolerant(ish).

>>18098

ROFL thank you Evil that's kind of you. :D

I know he mentioned another girl that lived here in Florida, but I don't think he ever mentioned if she was a furry or just a random chick. I can't think of anyone else off the top of my head.

>>18108

this reminds me, what is with naylor's obsession with flordia?

>>18109

It's shaped like a dick.

Does he actually use terms like "sweater-hogans" and "chest puppies" and "butterbean" in real life in a completely non-ironic way?

>>18114
Best thing I've heard in the history of forever.

>>18114

>>18143

sweater-hogans yes, the rest I've never heard him utter.

I still say "sweater hogans" is the lamest nickname for breasts that I've ever heard.

>>18155

No real person should ever use that phrase in real life, brother.

So is Jay actually bi, or in denial about it? Because... seriously, those dicks are like... way too graphically detailed than is necessary for hetero porn.

>>18222

He has admitted to being bi, but that he currently does not act upon it.

Shalindria, was this during or after you dated him?

>>18258

He dated a guy before. In Naylor's own words, "We sucked eachother's dicks."

Since the 'Sketch Blog' is becoming 'free', will it still be posted on /fisk so we can natter about the anatomy or lack thereof?

>>18260
I believe his exact words were, "We put our dicks in each other's mouths."

>>18277
Don't we all, though... don't we all...
*sighs happily*

>>18258

He blurted it out at MFF once, before we started dating. I am unsure how long before we dated that this went on.

>>18267

Potentially. There's no fixed schedule or notifications anymore, so it's kind of "check it every day and see if he posted something", and the first three posts seem to be -very- sketchy material. I'm not so interested in covering it.

>>18293
what a surprise, it's free so the quality went down. naylor needs a new means of motivation.

>>18098

jessie t wolf and he had a fling, i think

Silly question : Who's Jessie T Wolf?

Why hyena is black people? Why not lions

The real question is... Why all his furry women is a bunch of blonde head. It almost like watching claymore without the action

I really look forward to compare Naylor's early works with his new ones... His sketch blog was always being updated and I couldn't find a more-early-than-january-2009 vers of it...
Not that he's made a new public one, and halted the older... I wonder if anyone would have all those sketch blog images for me to compare right now... Is possible.

INB4 Google it faggot!
Already did, no luck...

>>18524

Because they're "scavengers"

Of course a quick wiki check will tell you that hyenas are really the true top preditors.

But more likey its becauses lions are cats.

Ok so what does that make the run of the mill dogs like Jessica and Robert? Dogs are the one thing I could never figure out what they are suppose to be. Do they just represent stupid people in Naylor's eyes, or did he forget to make them a certain sterotype?

Canines in the Naylorverse represent Asians/Mongoloids/Native Americans.

>>18694
I thought Raccoons were Native Americans and Asians were Red Pandas.

I think he's said they're European, as if most Americans also wouldn't be dogs. I think he described Rachel as "Scandinavian" before she appeared, though, so dogs are parts of Europe that aren't Scandinavia if he's still putting any thought into this crap at all.

KTLA predicts! Jokes about poop flavored beer!

I was mistaken, dogs apparently are European. But I'm fairly certain that rabbits are Scandanavian/Norwegian; dogs are German, maybe?

I thought rabbits were Irish because of the whole catholic thing with Tommy's family and Rachel.

>>18860 The fact that there's a debate about what human racial or ethic group an anthro is supposed to be only goes to prove how much a flawed idea making the attempt at it is. Certainly how flawed it's being executed.

The way he writes the dogs for instance changes depending on what type of species the dog is, because at times I also thought that dogs like doberman came of as "black" in how he wrote them so simular to how he writes hyenas. But then, that could be the ultimate problem, he can't write character personalities worth shit.

>>18610
these are all the ones i managed to find. I didn't have the time to check the dates on every sketch, so i just divided them in two folders according to the style. :)

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=3UFSQ7OD

i have a question too, is Naylor aware that there is a whole board against him? I'm curious.

>>18944
Oh yeah, he fucking knows we exist. Of course his precious little pride would never allow him to admit he's aware of our presence, but that doesn't stop him from watching it all the same.

To be truthful I always wondered if Naylor trolled the board from time to time and if so as whom.

Ok, here's one that's been on my mind really.

Since Naylor has a philosophy that would make most Objectivists stop and look twice, not the hard-core objectivist set of beliefs but his own corrupt version (kind of like communism how it's been executed thus far), what is he? What do we call such an irregular figure? How shall the aliens label this paragon of arrogance when they find the petrified and refusing to die remains of some of his "art"?

>>18975

I've suggested "Randian Objectivist" or "Novel Objectivist", since he purely follows the idealized, infallible, sociopathic version Rand presented in her fiction novels.

>>18975
Corrupted Objectivism or just Hypocrite sound like good choices. Sech's idea is probably the better and more accurate choice, but it helps if you've read the books and, well I'm not wasting my time on those.