damn, im striaght and even i think that image is pretty good O_o

>>10660

Dunno about that, it's more of a 'read between the lines' thing. Just look at archived forum chats about Naylor and Mat Sherer talking about why they're no longer friends who fuck on furryMUCK (it's not gay, Mat's character was female!). No way did they fall out because Mat 'hated America'.

>>10660

Also, you are looking at a picture of Fisk Black FUCKING a boy.

>>10711

What about this one?

>>10714

jesus balls

*saved*

oh man that is some grade A troll material right ther

>>10714

Not as gay, but still pretty gay.

>>10721

Not to spark a massive debate, but it IS a male and a female. How exactly does that qualify as gay?

>>10730

Because in hyper-masculine world where men showing emotions = queer, anything in your butt automatically makes you gay.

>>10730

>Not to spark a massive debate, but it IS a male and a female. How exactly does that qualify as gay?

A male is being penetrated by a simulated dick. This is not a homosexual act, since it's male-female, but it is SIMILAR to a homosexual act, and therefore can be described as 'gay'.

'Gay' in modern usage can describe homosexuality, or merely strong resemblance to homosexuality or perceived homosexual traits. Normally I would object to this broadening of word usage, but 'gay' didn't used to refer to homosexuality at all...

>>10730

Are you suggesting a dick in the ass isn't gay because the dick is fake?

That's why it wasn't said AS gay, but still a gay ring to it.

>>10738

Yes I AM suggesting that. It's still something happening between a male and female. By the logic you present, a guy who backdoors a girl is really gay because he's fucking her in the ass.

>>10739

Take a chill pill. They aren't referencing that all anal = being categorized as gay. What they are saying is that if you are MALE and you are taking something in the pooper = qualifies as quasi-gay classification in the very least.

>>10744
So... wait, you see a guy having sex with a girl, and the thought that occurs to you is, "That's gay"?

lolwut

>>10755
It isn't us on this board. This is how it is defined in American culture. Seriously. Ask any "Guy's guy", any guy who is even remotely insecure with his masculinity/homophobic. Ask "If a girl puts something in your butt, are you gay?" He'll get really big eyes and say "YEAH!"

Also, we're talking about NAYLOR here. Not anyone normal. We all know he's closeted. This is just an example.

Anyone remember the series of pictures of Fisk with the dragon chick who was a herm? I forget if the Dragonchick merely rimmed Fisk, or she drilled his asshole.

>>10755

Yes it is gay if the man is fucked by the woman wearing a strap-on.

>>10757
Yeah, she drilled his butt good.

>>10755

Maybe because it was Fisk in it

>>10758

that sounds like something CigarSkunk would say.. im watchin' you anon

>>10756
Just because they think that doesn't make it true.

>>10758
How to put this delicately...?

A man having sex with a woman is, by definition, a heterosexual act, you idiot.

>>10765

>A man having sex with a woman is, by definition, a heterosexual act, you idiot.

Pegging is heterosexual, because the participants are not the same sex. It is quote unquote gay because the man is being penetrated by a quote unquote penis. It is a totally gay heterosexual act, for the man. (Wearing a strap-on isn't a simulation of lesbian sex, so it couldn't be considered gay for the woman Particularly since 'gay' tends to imply male.)

>>10768

>gay heterosexual act
stopped reading there, thank you sir. Good day.

>>10768

>quote unquote

You do realize that this is a text-based imageboard, not an audio-based one, so you can actually type out the quotes, right?

>It is "gay" because the man is being penetrated by a "penis".

There, fixed. Also, as it pertains to that sentence: it isn't "gay" if a man is anally penetrated by a dildo; what makes it "gay" is if another man is involved with said penetration. It's entirely plausible for a man to use a dildo on himself without the aid of another person to anally stimulate himself, and that in and of itself does not make him a homosexual. By your logic, a woman being penetrated by another woman with a strap-on would be "straight" simply because she's being penetrated by a "penis".

Don't try and argue this subject. Not only are you going to get a lot of other posters mad at you, you're going to get the mods mad at you. And around here, the mods actually do something about idiots.

>A man having sex with a woman is, by definition, a heterosexual act, you idiot.

Indeed but it's still pretty gay.

>>Just because they think that doesn't make it true.

Well yes. I agree. I'm not arguing that it is, in fact, an act of some sort of homosexuality. But I was answering why someone would say it would be gay.

But I do think it's rather dubious to say what is "true" with regards to something that's both a semantics/language issue that's ALSO rather subjective. I don't think there's really an authority or definitive as to "What is gay" and "what is not". And "x is gay" is a language thing - gay these days is not only synonymous with homosexual, but stupid or lame.

>>10755

I can't tell if you just can't read or if you are that stupid.

I never stated where I sat on the argument, I tried to help you understand what their viewpoint was, since you seemed to have such huge difficulty seeing it.

... LOL, I just posted that picture figuring people would just be like "lol that's just another part of how that naylor sure likes it in the ass, which he'd deny now"

Oh silly me, things are always supposed to be complicated on the internet

>>10774
You're either irredeemably stupid or trolling. Either way, there's no reason for me to respond to you further.

>>10777
First, I refuse to accept the use of a term that refers to an entire demographic to describe something "stupid" or "lame". If Naylor started referring to anything he didn't like as "Muslim", we'd bite his head off for it. This is no different.

Second, the use of the term "gay" in this context is not meant to refer to pegging as "stupid" or "lame". It is intended to describe it as homosexual. Since the act in question involves a man and a woman having sex, the descriptor "gay" is factually inaccurate.

>First, I refuse to accept the use of a term that refers to an entire demographic to describe something "stupid" or "lame".

Hey, my English teacher refused to accept "ain't" as an acceptable word in conversation. Doesn't mean that it isn't a popular, widely used word in the English language.

Just because you don't Accept it doesn't mean that it isn't all over the place, and you aren't going to stop teenage boys from referring to everything under the sun as Gay. So if you "want someone's head" for it, then you better go after every teenage and 20-something boy in the US?

You can split hairs all you like. The common wisdom is "anything in your butt = you're gunna be a homosexual". IT'S ILLOGICAL. So stop trying to argue it's not fact. It's not fact, it's erroneous belief!

Jesus christ. This is like trying to explain why people in the 1400s thought the Earth was Flat, and the only response being given is "But it's not!" No shit it doesn't make you gay. But this is WHY someone would reply that way.

>>10788
>It's not fact, it's erroneous belief!

Then we are in agreement.

>>10787

Technically it's not gay, but you gotta wonder about a guy that asks a girl to put a fake dick on and fuck him in the ass. Just sayin'.

>>10803
So, what if she used her finger instead? Would that not be as "gay?"

>>10807

I think it's different, at least symbolically. Getting a kick out of anal stimulation isn't in itself gay, but as I said before, when you want the girl to put on a dick and do it, there's something to be said.

>>10809

I suppose so, though a strap-on dildo does fairly good with the stretching of the anus (stimulation) and the stimulation of the prostate well/at the same time. Better then a finger.

Also most girls aren't going to willingly strap-on fuck a guy unless they too get something out of it, I suppose its more of role-reversal play then 'teh gay'. Not to say it can't be in place of a male (I have heard of bisexual guys with preferences to males wanting women to do them via strapon.)

The thing to be said is "You want something larger in your ass".

It's shaped like a penis because that's what dildos are shaped like, the most common object to put in your ass.

Would it be better if it was a butt plug?

Besides. It might be HER idea. She might be the one who wants to fuck HIM in the ass.

>>10812

I guess he FANCIED it, himself, in this situation.

>>10810
>>10811

You're missing the point entirely.

>>10812

It doesn't matter if it's her idea as you'd have to be willing to do so which in that case raises some questions.

>>10817

The point that you think there's something wrong with wanting a long thick object in your ass means that suddenly you are attracted to men instead of women?

Your point is pretty asinine.

>>10817
It doesn't raise any questions. "I like anal pleasure" is not synonymous with "I like cock."

I am going to render the final verdict on this, and it will be the truth because if anyone says it's not the truth I will use the Hammer, which is the only truth that counts around here.

A guy being done up the ass with any sort of implement from a finger to a strapon is not, in and of itself, gay. It can cover a wide variety and range of meanings from just enjoying the physical stimulation to any number of kinks and fetishes that do not require homosexuality in the least.

However, when you have a severe male superiority complex, you draw dicks far more detailed than any anatomy textbook would ever be, and you are a mite sensitive about the fact that you've sucked cock in the past, then enjoying having something penis-shaped in your butt goes from highly circumstantial evidence to another nail in the coffin.

To help clarify it for Freehaven, it looks like Pablo is being turned fully into a shemale.

Atleast that is what I could figure from one of Naylor's "Promotional" sketches... take it how you will.

Apparently the picture was already posted here http://dammitfreehaven.com/fisk/res/6593.html#i7348 rofl..

On topic with Naylor's personality....

Does anyone have the "Cattoy.jpg" I think it was called.. where a female mouse literally sits on his muzzle, forcing him to eat her out?

Found it!

This sums up alot RIGHT HERE.

I seem to remember that in his Genus comics he was a lot more, well, relaxed. Cunnilingus, girls on top, etc.

>>10827
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CxVKtNkQAtw
My first thought

>>10827
Say what you want about Naylor, but I'd be totally fine with waking up to this.

>>10854
As I recall, Jay was a lot younger when he started publishing stuff in Genus, like, in his teens? This was also back in the nineties, before he got to watch his political party fuck up just about as bad as it possibly could, so he was probably more mellow back then. All Genus/VCL Fisk really did was fuck girls, and while Better Days/Original Life Fisk does that too, he's always pissed off about something...

(And nothing of value was lost.)

>>10880

You know, the number of warnings I gave and the amount of tolerance I showed about political bullshit outside of /use/ has been what could only be called "excessive".

Consider this a learning experience, I don't make front page posts or issue those warnings just to read myself type.

It's a little hard to avoid politics when Naylor and his shit is so political. It's like a "No religious talk rule" on the topic of European Middle Ages History.

>>10898

It's entirely possible to discuss politics without going to the "hurr hurr conservitards" place.