|
>>
|
No. 6961
ID: 2daf94
File: 128262368625.jpg (181.58KB, 500x637, zeriara_cute.jpg)
>>6939
I only comment on the fact that while, yes, if you talk about being into guro porn, you're likely to be flamed or dropped, cub porn seems to ME to get the most vitriol. But admittedly, I AM into cub and I'm NOT into guro, so I'll admit the very real possibility that (note "seems to ME") I'm just not seeing the anger against fetishes I'm not into because I'm not going to the right/wrong places. That's a likely chance, really. But yes, I see >>6934 point too: graphic violence is seen as AWESOME, so perhaps it gets less anger? I mean, while sure, there are Christian groups protesting just about everything Hollywood makes, I don't see people picketing on websites daily for bans on films like "Saw" because they turn average joes inbto willing murderers - or only people who are murderers go see them. But, sure, I look at cub porn, thus I'm a real-life pedophile. Also admittedly, many of those who call out cub porn artists/watchers as pedos are likely trolls, who have a habit of finding something that's likely to be annoying, and then slamming people in the face with it over and over until it crosses the line from annoying to angering. And then, claim that said person got angry because they found their secret shame (and still not actually believe what they're saying to the guy - this, too, is simply intended to make the guy angrier).
Either way, I like (some) cub porn (by no means all), but I don't tell the average furry about it. I don't tell the average guy-I-meet-in-public that I'm into furry, either. I don't see the requirement for either, just as I don't see the requirement to come out (as bi) to any/everyone.
And hey, trolls can call me a pedo if they want - I'll tell 'em it's not true, but I won't get into screaming matches. Even if they repeat it 400 times in the span of an hour.
Here, have some cute cub.
|